Frailty in severe COVID-19 survivors after ICU admission. A prospective and multicenter study in Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of frailty in survivors of severe COVID-19 admitted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and followed six months after discharge. DESIGN: An observational, prospective and multicenter, nation-wide study. SETTING: Eight adult ICU across eight academic acute care hospitals in Mexico. PATIENTS: All consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted in the ICU with acute respiratory failure between March 8, 2020 to February 28, 2021 were included. Frailty was defined according to the FRAIL scale, and was obtained at ICU admission and 6-month after hospital discharge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: The primary endpoint was the frailty status 6-months after discharge. A regression model was used to evaluate the predictors during ICU stay associated with frailty. RESULTS: 196 ICU survivors were evaluated for basal frailty at ICU admission and were included in this analysis. After 6-months from discharge, 164 patients were evaluated for frailty: 40 patients (20.4%) were classified as non-frail, 67 patients (34.2%) as pre-frail and 57 patients (29.1%) as frail. After adjustment, the need of invasive mechanical ventilation was the only factor independently associated with frailty at 6 month follow-up (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.70, 95% confidence interval 1.40-9.81, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Deterioration of frailty was reported frequently among ICU survivors with severe COVID-19 at 6-months. The need of invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU survivors was the only predictor independently associated with frailty.

Approach to the elderly patient with vertebral fracture due to bone fragility. / Abordaje del adulto mayor con fractura vertebral por fragilidad osea.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic and systemic disease characterized by alterations at the level of bone tissue with loss of bone mineral density, changes in microarchitecture, mineralization and remodeling that determine greater bone fragility and risk of fracture. Falls in the elderly are a risk factor closely related to fragility fractures and numerous studies demonstrate this relationship. Vertebral fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology differs from osteoporotic fractures at other skeletal sites, as only one-third are clinically recognized. In the elderly, the approach to osteoporotic vertebral fracture involves comprehensive evaluation of the patient, since it is both a cause and a consequence of multiple geriatric syndromes. This fracture, in its acute phase and subsequently, can lead to destabilization of other organs and systems of the elderly, medical complications at different levels, functional deterioration, dependence, and even the need for institutionalization. Therefore, it is important to carry out a multiple assessment of patients with vertebral fractures, addressing not only the history and risk factors of osteoporosis, but also those factors that lead to falls, as well as a comprehensive geriatric assessment and the complications closely associated with it. In this chapter we address each of these aspects that are necessary in the individual and multidimensional approach to the elderly patient with vertebral fracture due to bone fragility.

Multidimensional frailty connection in older patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) experience accelerated aging and, thus, a high prevalence of frailty. Our aim is to outline the type of frailty and prefrailty from a multidimensional perspective and the interaction of these dimensions in this scenery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study of patients with DM over 60 years-old. Variables related to nutrition, cognitive and emotional status, physical and instrumental functional capacity and social resources were collected. They were divided into three groups (robust, prefrail and frail) according to the Fried scale. Each of the variables in the groups were compared and a correspondence analysis was carried out to see the influence of some dimensions with others in each stage of frailty. RESULTS: 188 patients (mean age 72.6 + 7.5) were analysed. Of them, 105 patients had prefrailty and 66 were frail. With the exception of social resources, the rest of the variables had an increasing prevalence depending on the stage of frailty. However, in the correspondence analysis (with 22.9% of variation explained by two dimensions) it was only patients with frailty who were associated with worse functional capacity, cognitive and emotional situation and mild to moderate social incapacity. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample there was a high prevalence of prefrailty, and frailty associated with an increase in the prevalence of other different dimensions except social resources. However, the interaction between these dimensions was only evident in the case of patients with frailty.

Condición física, clínica y fragilidad de adultos mayores en Cali, Colombia / Physical and clinical condition and fragility of older adults in Cali, Colombia

Introducción: A nivel mundial el envejecimiento de la población ha sido un tema de interés a investigar, debido a la carga de morbimortalidad y los costos en salud que ocasiona. Así, resulta relevante indagar sobre aquellos aspectos que hacen más vulnerables a los adultos mayores. Objetivo: Comparar la condición física y clínica según la fragilidad en adultos mayores de Cali, Colombia. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal en adultos mayores de la ciudad de Cali, Colombia. El estudio tuvo aval ético institucional y todos los adultos mayores aceptaron participar firmando el consentimiento informado. Se usó la batería corta de desempeño físico (SPPB), y se compararon variables sociodemográficas, físicas y clínicas. y por nivel de fragilidad en vigoroso, prefrágil y frágil. Resultados: Se vincularon 470 adultos mayores con una edad promedio de 71,15±7,50 años, y en su mayoría del género femenino. Se presentaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas con un valor de p≤0,05 en la edad, estado socioeconómico, comuna, enfermedad, índice de masa corporal, actividad física, desempeño físico y riesgo de caídas; presentando mayor compromiso el grupo de fragilidad. Conclusión: El grupo de adultos mayores clasificados como frágiles presentaban menor condición física y clínica comparado con los grupos pre-frágiles y vigorosos. (AU)

Introduction: Worldwide, the aging of the population has been a topic of interest to investigate, due to the burden of morbidity and mortality and the health costs it causes. Thus, it is relevant to investigate those aspects that make older adults more vulnerable. Objective: To compare the physical and clinical condition according to frailty in older adults from Cali, Colombia. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study in older adults from the city of Cali, Colombia. The study had institutional ethical endorsement and all the older adults agreed to participate by signing the informed consent. The short physical performance battery (SPPB) was used, and sociodemographic, physical and clinical variables and by level of frailty were compared in vigorous, pre-frail and frail. Results: Four hundred and seventy older adults with an average age of 71.15±7.50 years and mostly female were enrolled. There were statistically significant differences, P≤0.05 in age, socioeconomic status, commune, disease, body mass index, physical activity, physical performance, and risk of falls. The fragility group presented greater compromise. Conclusion: The group of older adults classified as frail had a lower physical and clinical condition compared to the pre-frail and vigorous groups. (AU)

[Effect of frailty in health resource use in aged cancer patients]. / Efecto de la fragilidad en el consumo de recursos sanitarios en ancianos con cáncer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of frailty on health resource use in aged population with cancer. METHOD: Population-based cohort study with retrospective data collection and follow-up from January 2018 to December 2019 in people ≥65 years with cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 996 individuals were included, with a prevalence of frailty of 22.1%. Mortality at 2 years was 14.1% in the frail and 9.0% in the non-frail (p=0.028). Independently of age and sex, frailty increased the number of urgent hospitalizations (168%) and planned hospitalizations (64%), visits to the emergency room (111%), outpatient consultations (59%), day hospital sessions (30%) and visits to primary care (114%). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is more prevalent, determines a poorer prognostic and is associated with higher health resource use in aged population with cancer.

Effects of androgen deprivation therapy on elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer: PROSARC observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic carcinoma (PC) is a frequent neoplasm in elderly patients. Although androgen deprivation is associated with survival benefits, it is also related to adverse effects such as osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia, which can negatively affect the patient's quality of life. This study aims to quantify and evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia in elderly PC patients before and after androgen deprivation. We present data from an interim analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PROSARC is a national (Spain) prospective observational study (May-2022-May-2025) still in progress in 2 hospitals. It includes patients with high-risk PC, aged ≥70 years, non-candidates for local treatment and scheduled to start androgen deprivation therapy. The following variables are analyzed: comorbidity, frailty (Fried frailty phenotype criteria), osteoporosis, sarcopenia (EWGSOP2), fat mass and muscle mass, before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A 6-month follow-up was completed by 12/25 included patients (mean age, 84 years), with a high baseline prevalence of pre-frailty/frailty (67.7%), sarcopenia (66.7%) and osteoporosis (25%). Treatment did not significantly alter these variables or comorbidity. We observed changes in body mass index (p=0.666), decreased mean value of appendicular muscle mass (p=0.01) and increased percentage of fat mass (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk PC, advanced age and a considerable prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty and sarcopenia, androgen deprivation (ADT; 6 months) produces decreased muscle mass without impact on the incidence of the known adverse effects of androgen deprivation.

Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años / Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years

Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)

Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)

Utility of the modified 5-item frail index to predict complications and reoperations after hallux valgus percutaneous surgery. / [Artículo traducido] Utilidad del índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 items para predecir complicaciones y reoperaciones después de la cirugía percutánea de hallux valgus.

INTRODUCTION: The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) has been recently proposed as a useful tool for predicting postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery. We aimed to analyze the utility of this score in predicting complications and reoperations after hallux valgus (HV) deformity surgery. METHODS: 551 patients undergoing percutaneous HV corrective surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The mFI-5 was calculated based and patients were categorized in three groups: 1) non-frail: patients without any of the 5 comorbidities, 2) pre-frail: patients with one comorbidity and 3) frail: patients with two or more comorbidities. Complications and surgical reoperations were recorded. RESULTS: In the study period 772 percutaneous surgeries were performed to correct HV deformity, 551 patients were included with a median age of 60 (IQR 48-70). Three hundred eighty-nine patients were non-frail (70.6%), 132 were pre-frail (23.9%) and 30 were frail (5.4%). 75 patients suffered complications (13.6%). Even though the rate of complications was higher in frailty patients (23.3%) compared with pre-frail (13.6%) and non frail (12.8%), no significant differences were observed among groups. 48 patients required reoperation (8.7%) but the rate of reoperations among frailty groups was not significantly different (P=.11). Frailty patients had worse AOFAS scores at final follow up (P=.011). CONCLUSION: The mFI-5 was not useful to predict postoperative complications and reoperations after hallux valgus corrective surgery. Therefore, other factors should be considered when analyzing the risk of complications after HV corrective surgery.

Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años / Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years

Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)

Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)

Riesgos, indicaciones y aspectos técnicos de la colonoscopia en pacientes de edad avanzada o con fragilidad. Documento de posicionamiento de la Societat Catalana de Digestologia, la Societat Catalana de Geriatria i Gerontologia i la Societat Catalana de Medicina de Familia i Comunitaria / Risks, indications and technical aspects of colonoscopy in elderly or frail patients. Position paper of the Societat Catalana de Digestologia, the Societat Catalana de Geriatria i Gerontologia and the Societat Catalana de Medicina de Familia i Comunitaria

La colonoscopia (CS) es una técnica invasiva, fundamental para el estudio del colon. Es un procedimiento seguro y bien tolerado. Sin embargo, en personas de edad avanzada o con fragilidad (PEA/F) aumenta el riesgo de acontecimientos adversos, preparación insuficiente o exploraciones incompletas. El objetivo de este documento de posicionamiento fue consensuar recomendaciones sobre valoración del riesgo, indicaciones y cuidados especiales necesarios para la CS en PEA/F. El documento fue redactado por un grupo de expertos designados por la SCD, la SCGiG y la CAMFiC entre 2020 y 2022. Se consensuaron 8 afirmaciones y recomendaciones, entre ellas: no realizar CS a los pacientes con fragilidad avanzada, indicar CS solo si los beneficios son claramente superiores a los riesgos en fragilidad moderada, no repetir CS en PEA/F que tienen una CS completa previa sin lesiones y no indicar CS de cribado en pacientes con fragilidad moderada o avanzada (AU)

Colonoscopy (CS) is an invasive diagnostic and therapeutic technique, allowing the study of the colon. It is a safe and well tolerated procedure. However, CS is associated with an increased risk of adverse events, insufficient preparation and incomplete examinations in the elderly or frail patient (PEA/F). The objective of this position paper was to develop a set of recommendations on risk assessment, indications and special care required for CS in the PEA/F. It was drafted by a group of experts appointed by the SCD, SCGiG and CAMFiC that agreed on eight statements and recommendations, between them to recommend against performing CS in patients with advanced frailty, to indicate CS only if the benefits clearly outweigh the risks in moderate frailty and to avoid repeating CS in patients with a previous normal procedure. We also recommended against performing screening CS in patients with moderate or advanced frailty (AU)

Aplicabilidad del índice de fragilidad hepática en pacientes cirróticos evaluados para trasplante / Applicability of the liver frailty index in cirrhotic patients evaluated for transplantation

Introducción. En las últimas décadas se han desarrollado diferentes scores y modelos para predecir el pronóstico en pacientes con enfermedad hepática crónica avanzada. Los más reconocidos y utilizados son el sistema de estadificación de Child-Pugh (CP) y el score de MELD, pero estos carecen de herramientas para evaluar objetivamente otros factores pronósticos. Por este motivo, se ha incorporado el concepto de fragilidad a la hepatología clínica. El objetivo de este artículo es examinar la aplicabilidad del índice de fragilidad hepática (IFH) en pacientes con cirrosis evaluados para trasplante hepático en Uruguay. Metodología. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo en el Servicio de Enfermedades Hepáticas del Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas (HCFFAA) de enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2021. Resultados. Se evaluaron un total de 78 pacientes, excluyéndose 19 de estos, culminando con una muestra final de 59 pacientes. La edad media fue de 52 años, siendo el 66 % hombres. La principal etiología de la cirrosis fue la alcohólica, y la comorbilidad más frecuente fue el sobrepeso/obesidad (66 %). La media de IFH fue de 4,03 ± 0,45. El 90 % de los pacientes eran prefrágiles, el 10 % frágiles y ningún paciente fue clasificado como no frágil. El 76 % presentaba un estadio avanzado de la enfermedad al momento de la evaluación 42 % CP estadio B, 34 % CP C, 24 % CP A, con una media de MELD-Na de 17,8 ± 7,6. El 17 % tuvo complicaciones infecciosas. La mortalidad global (n=78) fue del 12 %, y la de los pacientes con IFH calculado fue del 22 %. Conclusiones. El cálculo del IFH es realizable en cirróticos como herramienta objetiva que brinda una mirada integral del paciente. A mayor severidad de la cirrosis, mayor es el IFH. Sin embargo, este índice no parece ser un predictor de la eventual realización del trasplante hepático, ni de muerte en lista de espera en nuestros pacientes.

Introduction. In recent decades, several scores and models have been proposed to predict prognosis in patients with advanced chronic liver disease. The most recognized and used are the Child-Pugh (CP) and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, but they lack tools to objectively evaluate other prognostic factors. For this reason, the concept of fragility has been incorporated into clinical hepatology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the liver frailty index (LFI) in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation in Uruguay. Methodology. Observational, descriptive and retrospective study at the Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas (HCFFAA) Liver Disease Service from January 2018 to December 2021. Results. A total of 78 patients were evaluated, 19 were excluded, culminating in a final sample of 59 patients. The mean age was 52 years, with 66% being men. The main etiology of cirrhosis was alcoholic and the most frequent comorbidity was overweight/obesity (66%). The mean LFI was 4.03 ± 0.45. 90% of patients were pre-fragile, 10% were fragile, and no patient was classified as non-fragile. 76% had an advanced stage of the disease at the time of evaluation: 42% CP stage B, 34% CP C, 24% CP A, with a mean MELD-Na of 17.8 ± 7.6. 17% had infectious complications. Overall mortality (n=78) was 12%, and that of patients with calculated LFI was 22%. Conclusions. The LFI can be calculated in cirrhotic patients, and it is an objective tool that provides a comprehensive view of the patient. LFI depends on the severity of the cirrhosis. However, this index is not a predictor of liver transplantation or death on the waiting list in our patients.

[Prevalence of frailty in a population aged 70 and older who pay a visit to health center and its detection in primary care]. / Prevalencia de fragilidad en personas de 70 o más años que acuden a un centro de salud y su detección en atención primaria.

INTRODUCTION: The detection of frailty in the elderly is key to preventing disability. The main objective of this study is to find out the proportion of frail people in subjects aged 70 and over who attend a health center in A Coruña (Spain). METHODS: Cross-sectional study, carried out from August 2020 to April 2021. Consecutive selection of patients ≥70 years, with Barthel ≥90, who accessed the health center. DEPENDENT VARIABLES: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Get Up and Go (TUG) and Gait Speed (MV); independent: gender, age, number of falls in the last year, number of drugs used chronically, and Charlson index. RESULTS: The sample was 114 people. The proportion of frail people is 16.7% (95% CI 10.94-24.57) with the SPPB, 28.6% in those aged 80 and over; and 36.8% using VM. The risk of frailty increases by at least 4.1% for each year of age after 70. Being a woman multiplies the risk by at least 1.5. The concordance between frailty according to the SPPB and MV is 46.8% (95% CI 30.85-62.77). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of frailty in independent people for basic ADL who attend a health center is at least 10.94%. Both the SPPB and the MV are feasible and useful methods in primary care.

[Medicine consumption as a factor associated with the state of fragility of the elderly patient in Spain]. / El consumo de medicamentos como factor asociado al estado de fragilidad en personas mayores de 65 años en España.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty in the elderly is a concept in constant evolution, with a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients. We assessed the associative strength of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and medication consumption in frailty and associated risk using various methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study carried out in 128 Primary Care Centers distributed throughout Spain, has a total sample of 2422 patients over 65 years of age, estimating the prevalence of frailty with the TUG test. Descriptive analysis of the categorical variables and associative strength of TUG for frailty and medication consumption was performed with distribution of absolute and relative frequencies and multinomial logistic regression. SPSS 22.0 was used, considering statistical significance p=0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty in the sample was 13.7%, accepting as frailty those subjects who obtained a score >20s in performing the TUG test. A third of these subjects classified as frail took more than 30s to complete the test and 32.5% of those studied would be classified as "pre-frail". We found a slight difference in the prevalence of frailty if we analyze the data according to sex, being 10.8% in men compared to 15.8% in women. Regarding pharmacological consumption, 72.8% of the subjects consume 5 or more drugs daily with similar proportions by sex, and with an average consumption of 6.57 drugs. The drugs with the greatest association with the degree of frailty were drugs used for dementia (40% of individuals who consumed them were considered frail), antiparkinsonian drugs (38%), antipsychotics (34%), antianemics (26.2%), anticoagulants (22.2%) and antiepileptics (21.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of frailty in elderly patients in Spain is initially notable, being present in 13.7% through the application of the TUG test. The age variable is the one that is most significantly associated with the frailty of the elderly patient. An association was demonstrated between the degree of frailty and total medication consumption. The prevalence of frailty was 4.7% in the non-polypharmacy group compared to 15.4% in the polypharmacy group and reaching 23.4% in the extreme polypharmacy group. The drugs with a greater association with the patient's degree of frailty were those used in the neurological/psychiatric sphere (antidementia, antiparkinsonian, antipsychotic or antiepileptic drugs).

[Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years]. / Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años.

INTRODUCTION: Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. SAMPLE: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). SETTING: northern Spain. VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. RESULTS: The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. CONCLUSIONS: The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use.

Risks, indications and technical aspects of colonoscopy in elderly or frail patients. Position paper of the Societat Catalana de Digestologia, the Societat Catalana de Geriatria i Gerontologia and the Societat Catalana de Medicina de Familia i Comunitaria. / Riesgos, indicaciones y aspectos técnicos de la colonoscopia en pacientes de edad avanzada o con fragilidad. Documento de posicionamiento de la Societat Catalana de Digestologia, la Societat Catalana de Geriatria i Gerontologia i la Societat Catalana de Medicina de Familia i Comunitaria.

Colonoscopy (CS) is an invasive diagnostic and therapeutic technique, allowing the study of the colon. It is a safe and well tolerated procedure. However, CS is associated with an increased risk of adverse events, insufficient preparation and incomplete examinations in the elderly or frail patient (PEA/F). The objective of this position paper was to develop a set of recommendations on risk assessment, indications and special care required for CS in the PEA/F. It was drafted by a group of experts appointed by the SCD, SCGiG and CAMFiC that agreed on eight statements and recommendations, between them to recommend against performing CS in patients with advanced frailty, to indicate CS only if the benefits clearly outweigh the risks in moderate frailty and to avoid repeating CS in patients with a previous normal procedure. We also recommended against performing screening CS in patients with moderate or advanced frailty.

Implementación de un cribado de fragilidad desde atención primaria en el Área Sanitaria de Ferrol / Implementation of a frailty screening from primary care in the Health Area of Ferro

Objetivos: Conocer la prevalencia de fragilidad entre los sujetos de 70 o más años que acuden a la consulta de enfermería de atención primaria, así como conocer las variables asociadas a la presencia de fragilidad. Metodología: Estudio observacional transversal en el que, tras un muestreo por conveniencia, se utilizó la Short Physical Performance Battery para realizar un cribado de fragilidad a 114 pacientes. Se utilizó una regresión logística multivariante para conocer las variables asociadas a la fragilidad. Resultados: Un 35,4% de los sujetos estudiados se catalogaron como frágiles tras la realización de las pruebas de función física. Las variables asociadas en el análisis multivariado a la fragilidad fueron la edad, el entorno de residencia, el riesgo de caídas, la toma de anticoagulantes orales y el tratamiento con insulina lenta. Conclusiones: Este estudio ha evidenciado las altas prevalencias existentes de fragilidad, poniendo de relieve la importancia de este tipo de cribados y la pertinencia de que la enfermería de atención primaria contribuya a su detección y manejo.(AU)

Objectives: To know the prevalence of frailty among subjects aged 70 or over who attend the primary care nursing consultation, as well as to know the variables associated with the presence of frailty. Methodology: Cross-sectional observational study in which, after convenience sampling, the Short Physical Performance Battery was used to screen 114 patients for frailty. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with frailty. Results: 35.4% of the subjects studied were classified as frail after performing the physical function tests. The variables associated with frailty in the multivariate analysis were age, residence environment, risk of falls, taking oral anticoagulants, and slow insulin treatment. Conclusions: This study has evidenced the high existing prevalence of frailty, highlighting the importance of this type of screening and the relevance of primary care nursing contributing to its detection and management.(AU)

Estimación del envejecimiento en población laboral y relación con salud psicofísica y condiciones de trabajo / Estimation of aging in the working population and relationship with psychophysical health and working conditions

Introducción:El envejecimiento de la población conlleva una mayor prevalencia de trabajadores con patología psicofísica y cognitiva con riesgo de fragilidad.Objetivo:Estimar la relación entre envejecimiento asociado a la edad en hombres y mujeres, y la salud psicofísica, emocional y deterioro cognitivo en población laboral y su repercusión según tipo de trabajo y turnicidad.Material y Método:Estudio transversal en 389 trabajadores. Se valora <50 y ≥50 años con prensión manual, circunferencia del gemelo, Fragilidad-Frail, depresión-Beck, Ansiedad-Estado-Rasgo y deterioro cognitivo-Pfeiffer y la influencia del tipo de trabajo y turnicidad.Resultados:Existe mayor fragilidad-Frail en hombres ≥ 50 años (p<0,05). El resto de variables relacionadas con estado físico, emocional y cognitivo no muestra diferencias por edad, ni con el tipo de trabajo y turnicidad (p>0,05).Conclusiones:La fragilidad estimada con el cuestionario de Frail muestra los resultados más precoces de fragilidad en hombres ≥ 50 años. (AU)

Introduction:The aging of the population leads to a higher prevalence of workers with psychophysical and cognitive pathologies at risk of frailty.Objective:To estimate the relationship between age-associated aging in men and women and psychophysical, emotional health, and cognitive impairment in the working population and its impact according to the type of work and shift work.Material and Method:Cross-sectional study with 389 workers. We assessed individuals aged <50 and ≥50 years using handgrip strength, calf circumference, Frailty-Frail assessment, Beck Depression Inventory for depression, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for anxiety, and Pfeiffer test for cognitive impairment, while also considering the influence of the type of work and shift work.Results:There is a higher prevalence of frailty in men aged ≥50 years (p<0.05). The rest of the variables related to physical, emotional, and cognitive status do not show significant differences based on age, type of work, or shift work (p>0.05).Conclusions:Frailty, as assessed by the Frail questionnaire, reveals the earliest signs of frailty in men aged ≥50 years. (AU)

Impacto de las fracturas por fragilidad en mujeres españolas con osteoporosis posmenopáusica / Impact of fragility fractures in postmenopausal Spanish women with osteoporosis

Objetivo: dada la repercusión que tienen las fracturas por fragilidad y sus secuelas en la vida de las mujeres con osteoporosis posmenopáusica (OPM), el objetivo de este estudio es describir y analizar su impacto en esta población. Material y métodos: se realizó una encuesta a mujeres posmenopáusicas con fractura por fragilidad en un diseño observacional transversal. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, impacto de la fractura (necesidad de cuidados, productividad laboral), calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS, mediante cuestionario QUALEFFO-31) y disposición a pagar (DAP) por recuperarla. Resultados: participaron 120 mujeres, promedio de edad 62 ± 7 años. Las fracturas más frecuentes fueron las de radio distal (29,9 %) y las vertebrales (21,3 %). Un 53,3 % necesitó cuidados durante su recuperación (76,5 % informales; 24,9 % formales) y un 4,2 % tuvo que ingresar en un centro/residencia sociosanitaria. De aquellas que trabajaban cuando se produjo la fractura (62,5 %), el 56 % vio su vida laboral afectada (69,3 % incapacidad temporal; 17,3 % incapacidad permanente; 10,7 % reducción de jornada; 10,7 % abandono laboral; 5,3 % permiso/excedencia; 3,6 % prejubilación). El impacto de la fractura se debió principalmente al dolor (71,7 %), dificultad para realizar actividades cotidianas (48,3 %), problemas de movilidad (46,7 %) y estado emocional (41,7 %). La mayor DAP se ofreció por recuperar la capacidad para realizar actividades cotidianas y el estado emocional. La puntuación total QUALEFFO-31 (0-100) fue 49,9 ± 10,8 (función mental: 68,3 ± 7,3; dolor: 56 ± 22,6; función física: 39,3 ± 15,5). Conclusiones: las fracturas por fragilidad tienen un alto impacto en la calidad de vida de las mujeres con OPM. Resulta fundamental poner en valor aquellos aspectos que más les preocupan para optimizar su abordaje. (AU)

Objective: Given the impact of fragility fractures and their consequences on the lives of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), the objective of this study is to describe and analyze the impact of this kind of fractures on this population. Materials and methods: A survey was conducted among postmenopausal women with fragility fractures in a cross-sectional observational design. Sociodemographic variables, fracture impact (need for care, work productivity), and data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL, assessed using the QUALEFFO-31 questionnaire), and willingness to pay (WTP) to regain HRQoL were collected. Results: A total of 120 women participated, with a mean age of 62 ± 7 years. The most frequent fractures described were distal radius fractures (29.9 %), followed by vertebral fractures (21.3 %). A total of 53.3 % required care during their recovery (76.5 %, informal; 24.9 %, formal), and 4.2 % had to be admitted to a health care or nursing home. Among those who were working when the fracture occurred (62.5 %), 56 % had their working life affected (69.3 %, temporary disability; 17.3 %, permanent disability; 10.7 %, reduced working hours; 10.7 %, quit their jobs; 5.3 %, leave of absence; and 3.6 %, early retirement). The impact of the fracture was primarily due to pain (71.7 %), difficulty performing activities of daily living (48.3 %), mobility problems (46.7 %), and emotional state (41.7 %). The highest WTP was offered to regain the ability to perform activities of daily living and improve the emotional state. The overall QUALEFFO-31 score (0-100) was 49.9 ± 10.8 (mental function, 68.3 ± 7.3; pain, 56 ± 22.6; physical function, 39.3 ± 15.5). Conclusions: Fragility fractures play a significant role on the quality of life of women with PMO. It is of paramount importance to value the aspects that concern them the most to optimize their management. (AU)

Síndrome de la Fragilidad y sarcopenia en ancianos con y sin diabetes mellitus tipo 2 del municipio de Sinop, Mato Grosso: un estudio epidemiológico / Frailty Syndrome and sarcopenia in older adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus in the municipality of Sinop, Mato Grosso: an epidemiological study / Síndrome da Fragilidade e sarcopenia em idosos com e sem diabetes mellitus tipo 2 do município de Sinop, Mato Grosso: um estudo epidemiológico

Objetivo: relacionar el Síndrome de la Fragilidad y la sarcopenia en ancianos con y sin diabetes mellitus tipo 2; e identificar los potenciales factores de riesgo para la fragilidad y sarcopenia. Método: estudio epidemiológico descriptivo realizado en 140 ancianos del municipio de Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Para evaluar el Síndrome de la Fragilidad se utilizó el fenotipo de fragilidad y para la evaluación de la sarcopenia el cuestionario de evaluación física con medida de la circunferencia de la pantorrilla. Resultados: en lo que se refiere al Síndrome de la Fragilidad se obtuvo un mayor porcentaje para ancianos con diabetes mellitus tipo 2, cuando comparados con aquellos sin la enfermedad (p = 0,00). En relación a la presencia de sarcopenia, los ancianos con y sin diabetes mellitus tipo 2 presentaron valores semejantes, sin significación estadística (p = 0,74). El Síndrome de la Fragilidad presentó asociación con: inactividad física (IC95%: 3,29-56,55); intervalo etario superior a 75 años (IC95%: 3,30-27,82); baja renta familiar (IC95%: 1,80-50,98); y, comorbilidades (IC95%: 4,9-5,4). Entre tanto, la sarcopenia fue asociada a la presencia de la inactividad física (IC95%: 1,26-10,44), al bajo peso/eutrófico (IC95%: 3,32- 26,76) y a la desnutrición/riesgo nutricional (IC95%: 1,30-7,70), en los ancianos con y sin diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Conclusión: los ancianos diabéticos tienen mayor vulnerabilidad para desarrollar el Síndrome de Fragilidad, lo que requiere la adopción de medidas preventivas en la atención primaria a la salud.

Objective: to relate Frailty Syndrome and sarcopenia in older adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus and identify potential risk factors for frailty and sarcopenia. Method: this descriptive epidemiological study was conducted with 140 older adults in the municipality of Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil. The frailty phenotype was used for the assessment of Frailty Syndrome, and a physical assessment questionnaire with calf circumference measurement was used for the assessment of sarcopenia. Results: regarding Frailty Syndrome, a higher percentage was observed in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to those without the disease (p = 0.00). Concerning the presence of sarcopenia, older adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus showed similar values, with no statistical significance (p = .74). Frailty Syndrome was associated with physical inactivity (95%CI: 3.29-56.55), age over 75 years (95%CI: 3.30- 27.82), low family income (95%CI: 1.80-50.98), and comorbidities (95%CI: 4.90-5.40). However, sarcopenia was associated with the presence of physical inactivity (95%CI: 1.26-10.44), low weight/ eutrophic (95%CI: 3.32-26.76), and malnutrition/nutritional risk (95%CI: 1.30-7.70) for older adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: older adults with diabetes have a higher vulnerability to develop Frailty Syndrome, necessitating the adoption of preventive measures in primary healthcare.

Objetivo: relacionar a Síndrome da Fragilidade e a sarcopenia em idosos com e sem diabetes mellitus tipo 2; e identificar os potenciais fatores de risco para fragilidade e sarcopenia. Método: estudo epidemiológico descritivo realizado com 140 idosos do município de Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Para a avaliação da Síndrome da Fragilidade, utilizou-se o fenótipo de fragilidade, e, para a avaliação da sarcopenia, o questionário de avaliação física com medida de circunferência da panturrilha. Resultados: quanto à Síndrome da Fragilidade, obteve-se maior percentual para idosos com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 quando comparado àqueles sem a doença (p = 0,00). Em relação à presença de sarcopenia, os idosos com e sem diabetes mellitus tipo 2 apresentaram valores semelhantes, sem significância estatística (p = 0,74). Síndrome da Fragilidade apresentou associação com inatividade física (IC95%: 3,29-56,55), faixa etária superior a 75 anos (IC95%: 3,30-27,82), baixa renda familiar (IC95%: 1,80-50,98) e comorbidades (IC95%: 4,9-5,4). Entretanto, a sarcopenia foi associada à presença da inatividade física (IC95%: 1,26-10,44), baixo peso/eutrófico (IC95%: 3,32-26,76) e desnutrição/risco nutricional (IC95%: 1,30-7,70) para os idosos com e sem diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Conclusão: os idosos diabéticos têm maior vulnerabilidade para desenvolver a Síndrome de Fragilidade, requerendo a adoção de medidas preventivas na atenção primária à saúde.

Predictive validity of the Clinical Frailty Scale-España on the increase in dependency after hospital discharge.

INTRODUCTION: The frailty present at hospital admission and the stressors to which patients are subjected during their stay may increase dependency at hospital discharge. OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive validity of the Clinical Frailty Scale-España (CFS-Es) on increased dependency at 3 and 12 months (m) after hospital discharge. METHODOLOGY: Multicentre cohort study in 2020-2022. Including patients with >48 h stay in intensive care units (ICU) and non-COVID-19. VARIABLES: pre-admission frailty (CFS-Es). Sex, age, days of stay (ICU and hospital), dependency on admission and at 3 m and 12 m after discharge (Barthel index), muscle weakness (Medical Research Council Scale sum score <48), hospital readmissions. STATISTICS: descriptive and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 254 cases were included. Thirty-nine per cent were women and the median [Q1-Q3] age was 67 [56-77] years. SAPS 3 on admission (median [Q1-Q3]): 62 [51-71] points. Frail patients on admission (CFS-Es 5-9): 58 (23%). Dependency on admission (n = 254) vs. 3 m after hospital discharge (n = 171) vs. 12 m after hospital discharge (n = 118): 1) Barthel 90-100: 82% vs. 68% vs. 65%. 2) Barthel 60-85: 15% vs. 15% vs. 20%. 3) Barthel 0-55: 3% vs. 17% vs. 15%. In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for the variables recorded, we observed that frail patients on admission (CFS-Es 5-9) are 2.8 times (95%CI: 1.03-7.58; p = 0.043) more likely to increase dependency (Barthel 90-100 to <90 or Barthel 85-60 to <60) at 3 m post-discharge (with respect to admission) and 3.5 times (95%CI: 1.18-10.30; p = 0.024) more likely to increase dependency at 12 m post-discharge. Furthermore, for each additional CFS-Es point there is a 1.6-fold (95%CI: 1.01-2.23; p = 0.016) greater chance of increased dependency in the 12 m following discharge. CONCLUSIONS: CFS-Es at admission can predict increased dependency at 3 m and 12 m after hospital discharge.